claake code
§ 01 — why it exists, who it's for

AI coding tools should not be black boxes.

Many AI coding assistants hide tools, permissions, system prompts and provider choices. Claake Code exists for developers and teams that want a controllable, reversible and auditable workflow — and it stays MIT licensed and forkable.

the problem

Opaque agents are hard to trust.

When a coding agent hides what it can see, what it can run or which context it is using, developers cannot reliably review risk or reproduce behavior.

the response

The harness stays editable — and owned by you.

Tools, settings, skills, MCP, database access and providers stay visible and interchangeable. The downloaded binary is the same open-source app maintainers use, forkable down to the agent loop.

  • All tool descriptions are editable and every tool is individually toggleable.
  • AGENTS.md and DESIGN.md let each repo carry its own operating manual and design system.
  • MCP servers are configured per workspace and picked up by the agent without hidden wiring.
  • No telemetry, no training on transcripts, no enterprise tier hiding the useful parts.
AGENTS.md · project memory
# House rules

- Prefer dedicated tools over bash.
- Keep the surface editable: every tool
  description lives in settings, every tool
  has an on/off toggle.
- Ask before destructive database operations.

## tools
mcp.*      : per workspace, hot-reloaded
skill      : markdown in ~/.claakecode/skills
team_run   : parallel agent workstreams
rollback   : restore safe checkpoints
best for
Open-source AI IDE seekers Permission-conscious teams MCP users Multi-provider developers Full workspace workflows No-telemetry users

Often described as an open-source alternative to closed AI coding IDEs, Claude Code-style coding agents, or Cursor-style editing workflows — not because it claims to be the fastest, but because the agent surface can be inspected, edited and restricted.

Palette